• About
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Events
Thursday, June 19, 2025
Newsletter
SUBSCRIBE
  • News
    • Contracts awarded
    • Open tenders and opportunities
    • Events
  • Features
  • Water
  • Wastewater
  • Gas
  • Electricity
  • Civil Construction
  • Events
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Contracts awarded
    • Open tenders and opportunities
    • Events
  • Features
  • Water
  • Wastewater
  • Gas
  • Electricity
  • Civil Construction
  • Events
No Results
View All Results
Home

Academics call for reforms to Murray-Darling Basin projects

by Utility Journalist
February 7, 2018
in Asset management, News, Sustainability, Water
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A group of academics has called for reforms into the way projects along the Murray-Darling Basin are administered, following concerns that billions of dollars had been wasted on irrigation projects that have failed to achieve their intended environmental outcomes.

The  group of 12 academics, which includes economists and some of the nation’s top water scientists, has released a declaration in Adelaide urging fundamental changes to the way the system is administered.

Those changes include halting subsidies and grants to irrigators that have been introduced under the Murray-Darling Basin Plan.

According to the researchers, $6 billion has already been spent on water recovery projects across the basin, including $4 billion to subsidise irrigation.

“For many of these projects there is no scientific evidence that they have actually increased net stream flows,” the scientists stated.

“Despite allocating half a billion dollars in 2007 to upgrade water meters in the Basin, as much as 75 per cent of all surface water diversions in the northern part of the basin may still not have water meters.”

The criticisms have been rejected by the Federal Government, the Murray-Darling Basin Authority and the National Irrigators Council.

The declaration also calls for an independent audit of all water recovery measures across the Basin, and a new scientific body to advise governments on the implementation of the 2007 Federal Water Act.

Former head of CSIRO Land and Water, Professor John Williams, said the science underpinning current water policy was deeply flawed, and called for immediate changes to ensure more water flow through the system.

“We’ve got to have a river system that has sufficient water flow to flood, recharge groundwater, take salt to the ocean, and provide wetlands and habitat,” Mr Williams said.

“Our current system is not doing that.”

According to data cited by the scientists for The Conversation, buying water back from irrigators is “60 per cent cheaper” than spending on irrigation engineering projects.

Mr Williams said currently, authorities were “playing accounting games” that made it “look as though we’re doing something”.

The agency tasked with overseeing the multi-billion-dollar basin reform plan, the Murray-Darling Basin Authority, has hit back at the scientists’ claims.

Chief executive, Phillip Glyde, said, “Claims that the plan’s investment in more modern and efficient water infrastructure is not delivering benefits for the environment are simply not true.”

The authority said the plan was a “visionary, long-term policy” and that water infrastructure efficiency programs had already helped recover water for the environment.

“The Basin Plan was neither expected nor intended to deliver immediate results,” Mr Glyde said.

“It is simply not possible to repair 100 years of damage to such a vast river system overnight, or even within five years.”

Federal Assistant Minister for Water, Anne Ruston, said the recommendations did not factor in the economic needs of farming communities in the basin, and that favouring water buybacks could be harmful.

“We can’t just decimate out regional communities by buying back water out of them and leaving them with no means of future existence,” Ms Ruston said.

National Irrigators Council CEO, Steve Whan, also criticised the scientists’ findings, saying the benefits would be witnessed by future generations.

“The important thing about this to remember, we are five years into a plan that is going to take a number of years to implement, but [it takes] decades to see good environmental outcomes,” Mr Whan said. 

Related Posts

Image:  kstipek/stock.adobe.com

WA seeks industry feedback on future energy needs

by Sarah MacNamara
June 18, 2025

The Western Australian Government will engage with peak industry bodies to assess how the state can position its economy to...

The new community battery in Coburg. Image: Jemena

Jemena switches on new community battery

by Sarah MacNamara
June 18, 2025

Residents in Coburg are set to harness cheaper, cleaner and reliable energy, with Jemena and the Federal Government launching a...

Image: New South Wales Government

NSW Government unveils landmark VPP

by Sarah MacNamara
June 18, 2025

New South Wales is celebrating the launch of its first large-scale virtual power plant (VPP), aimed at managing the reliable...

Read our magazine

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
Utility is the title of choice for decision makers at all levels of water and energy utilities, as well as other major players like consulting engineers and first-tier contractors. Utility is integrated across print and online, and explores the biggest news and issues across the utility industry. It is Australia’s only dedicated utility magazine, and covers all areas of the utility sector, including water and sewer, gas, electricity, communications and the NBN.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Utility

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Digital magazine
  • Events
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Water
  • Electricity
  • Projects
  • Water and Wastewater Treatment
  • Spotlight
  • Civil Construction
  • Renewable Energy

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
SUBSCRIBE
  • News
    • Contracts awarded
    • Open tenders and opportunities
    • Events
  • Features
  • Water
  • Wastewater
  • Gas
  • Electricity
  • Civil Construction
  • Events
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited